点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
驻英国使馆举办2023年“欢乐春节” 新闻发布会******
中新网1月19日电 据中国驻英国大使馆微信公众号消息，2023年1月17日，2023年英国“欢乐春节”系列活动新闻发布会在驻英使馆文化处举行。来自英国科学博物馆、伦敦爱乐乐团、伦敦华埠商会、英国国家海事博物馆及格林尼治皇家天文台、布里斯托市政府、泽西岛政府、爱丁堡市政府、爱丁堡旅游局、欧亚交流协会、皇家威尔士音乐与戏剧学院、中英国际音乐节、英国中国美食节和伯明翰、曼彻斯特等地的十余家活动主办方代表，以及人民日报、新华社、中央广播电视总台、CGTN、中国日报、人民网、环球时报、欧洲时报等媒体记者与会。
新闻发布会首先播放了杨晓光临时代办的致辞视频。他代表郑泽光大使和中国驻英国使馆向2023年“欢乐春节”活动在全球的启动表示热烈祝贺，表示“欢乐春节”是传承中国传统文化的庆典，是东西方文明交流互鉴的盛会。近年来英国各地持续开展丰富多彩的“欢乐春节”活动，其秉承的4H理念(Hope、Home、Harmony、Health)受到了在英民众的广泛认可，加深了中英两国人民的相互理解。2023年，希望通过“欢乐春节”这一全球品牌，中英两国将能够增进交流，扩大合作，推动双边关系取得新发展。
使馆新闻发言人、公使衔参赞毕海波主持发布会。文化处公使衔参赞李立言介绍了2023年英国“欢乐春节”活动整体情况，驻伦敦旅游办事处主任薛伶出席了发布会。李立言表示，今年全英“欢乐春节”系列活动遍及伦敦、爱丁堡、伯明翰、布里斯托等8个城市，由近20家政府部门、友好团体和文化艺术机构主办，集中在春节前后一个月开展大小近百余项活动，内容十分丰富。这些“欢乐春节”活动的举办不仅有助于增进英国民众对中国文化艺术和旅游资源的深入了解，彰显东西方文明交流互鉴的魅力，而且有利于促进两国民间友好，推动中英关系健康发展。
2023年，英国“欢乐春节”系列活动在疫情后首次以线下活动为主，并打造了“伦敦+”模式，即以伦敦为中心，覆盖伯明翰、布里斯托、卡迪夫、爱丁堡、格拉斯哥、泽西岛、曼彻斯特，活动主要包括：“伦敦眼”为中国春节点亮、英国国家海事博物馆及格林尼治皇家天文台中国新年庆典、《敦煌•慈悲颂》英国首演暨伦敦爱乐乐团新春音乐会、特拉法加广场中国春节庆典、英国科学博物馆“科学春晚”、重庆美食文化海外推广体验等系列活动，伯明翰“肖荻与友中国新春系列晚会”，布里斯托市政府兔年新春活动，卡迪夫、伦敦和格拉斯哥“沈洋新春音乐会”，爱丁堡中国新年音乐会及中国新年灯光秀、爱丁堡中国新年庆典，泽西岛政府春节庆典，曼彻斯特春节活动，中英国际音乐节线上活动等。
发布会上还播放了著名钢琴家、2023“欢乐春节”文化大使郎朗专程为本次活动发来的视频贺辞，各主办机构代表分别介绍了准备开展的春节文化活动情况，媒体记者进行了现场采访。英国皇家伯明翰音乐学院钢琴系教授肖荻最后还演奏了《春节序曲》《浏阳河》等大家耳熟能详的中国民族乐曲，将现场嘉宾带入了喜迎兔年新春的热烈气氛中。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)